1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,360
Welcome back to The Mining Pod.

2
00:00:01,360 --> 00:00:05,680
On today's show, we're joined by Paul Sztorc and Austin Alexander of LayerTwo Labs,
a new

3
00:00:05,680 --> 00:00:11,120
Bitcoin company that raised $3 million to bring sidechains to Bitcoin through an
implementation

4
00:00:11,120 --> 00:00:15,640
of BIP300/301, often referred to as Drivechain.

5
00:00:15,640 --> 00:00:19,960
This is a fairly technical conversation we did not do a whole lot of edits to.

6
00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:25,680
We talk a lot about Drivechains themselves, how Bitcoin miners can earn more fees
through

7
00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:30,800
Drivechains, the history of sidechain implementations, and how this whole thing
works with the Lightning

8
00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:31,800
Network.

9
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:35,000
The future of digital asset mining calls for top technical talent.

10
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:37,800
Enhance your ASIC education with Foundry's hands-on courses.

11
00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:42,080
Led by veteran industry instructors, Foundry's three-day mining intensive and
five-day mining

12
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:47,080
technician academy programs cover a range of topics, from identifying issues and
troubleshooting

13
00:00:47,080 --> 00:00:51,160
common hardware failures to coursework covering Bitcoin's global impact.

14
00:00:51,160 --> 00:00:56,240
And to enthusiasts and professionals alike, visit www.foundryacademy.com to learn
more

15
00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:58,360
and sign up for the course that's right for you.

16
00:01:10,960 --> 00:01:13,120
Paul, welcome to The Mining Pod.

17
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:19,360
Big news for you both, announced a $3 million seed round for LayerTwo Labs to bring
hopefully

18
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:24,520
an end to the altcoin shenanigans in other worlds by implementing Drivechains for
the

19
00:01:24,520 --> 00:01:25,520
masses.

20
00:01:25,520 --> 00:01:26,520
But welcome to the show.

21
00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:27,520
Thank you both for joining.

22
00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:28,520
Hey, thanks for having us.

23
00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:29,520
Cool.

24
00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:31,520
So we'll start off with a little intro.

25
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,520
I don't think a lot of this audience, and we even said this before we started, you
guys

26
00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:39,520
don't know a lot of miners, or maybe you do know a few here or there who are mining
at

27
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:40,520
home.

28
00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:44,120
But our audience is probably not familiar with you, so I'd love to get an intro from

29
00:01:44,120 --> 00:01:45,120
both of you.

30
00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:49,480
So Paul, I'll hand it off to you first for an intro, and then to Austin, then we'll
talk

31
00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:50,480
about LayerTwo Labs.

32
00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:51,480
Okay.

33
00:01:51,480 --> 00:01:58,720
I got into Bitcoin a long time ago, like 2012, 2013.

34
00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:01,880
And I started blogging about...

35
00:02:01,880 --> 00:02:05,960
People were discussing all kinds of topics and I wrote once a famous essay called,
Nothing

36
00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:09,160
is Cheaper Than Proof of Work.

37
00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:11,880
So I started this blog, Truthcoin.info in 2014.

38
00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:16,680
And I did that both to talk about Bitcoin concepts and also to promote this
peer-to-peer

39
00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,720
Oracle software that I had written.

40
00:02:19,720 --> 00:02:22,160
That was called Truthcoin, actually.

41
00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:25,800
And that was supposed to be for Bitcoin prediction markets, which is a whole
different thing

42
00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:26,800
that we can discuss.

43
00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:29,360
But that was how I got in.

44
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:34,920
And then I was actually hired into the industry to work on that, which I did.

45
00:02:34,920 --> 00:02:39,480
And while I was doing that, I presented at Scaling Bitcoin, I got into sidechains.

46
00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:45,040
And eventually I authored these two BIPs, 300 and 301, which are about sidechains
and

47
00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:47,080
merge mining.

48
00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:49,440
And now that has led us here, basically.

49
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:50,440
To this podcast.

50
00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:51,440
Awesome.

51
00:02:51,440 --> 00:02:54,320
Hand it off to you, though, for an intro before we jump into LayerTwo Labs.

52
00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:55,320
Thank you.

53
00:02:55,320 --> 00:03:06,120
Yes, I first became aware of Bitcoin in 2011 and was just a hobbyist on the
periphery of

54
00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:07,120
my interests.

55
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:17,520
And then in 2013, there was a Bitcoin conference in New York.

56
00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:26,600
And I went to that and I started getting really, I would say, obsessed at that
point.

57
00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:36,160
And so at the time I had been working, we were doing election consulting.

58
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:42,200
And I basically told my boss that I wasn't going to do anything but Bitcoin anymore.

59
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:45,120
And it was the only thing that mattered, the only thing that was important.

60
00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:47,720
And so at first, obviously, he didn't take that very well.

61
00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:54,160
But after a few weeks, I think he came around and I convinced him, saw the light.

62
00:03:54,160 --> 00:04:00,440
And we, towards the end of that year, opened the Bitcoin Center in New York.

63
00:04:00,440 --> 00:04:05,200
And we had plans in place to open an exchange and such.

64
00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:11,400
But the regulatory situation in New York kind of got a little dicey.

65
00:04:11,400 --> 00:04:18,760
And sometime the following year, I joined Kraken.

66
00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:25,480
And I was working at Kraken in various roles for the last eight years until a short
time

67
00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:31,320
ago when Paul and I kind of formalized this new business.

68
00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,520
And now we're here.

69
00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:37,680
So Hivechain enables a new tech stack to be built on top of Bitcoin that allows for
more

70
00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:40,800
inclusivity of different projects.

71
00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,520
So in essence, I'd be able to build my Ethereum product on top of Bitcoin, perhaps,
or something

72
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:47,520
of that nature?

73
00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:48,520
Yes.

74
00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:53,760
And we already have a clone of the latest version of Ethereum that we made as the
BIP300

75
00:04:53,760 --> 00:04:54,760
Hivechain.

76
00:04:54,760 --> 00:04:58,960
So anyone can test this out on our testnet software, and you can run it and you can
actually

77
00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:04,560
connect it to, you can connect it to like Ethereum.org, like they have like little
tools

78
00:05:04,560 --> 00:05:05,560
and stuff.

79
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:09,400
And it will not notice that, it won't even notice that it's, it's not connecting to
the

80
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:10,400
real Ethereum.

81
00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,960
No, it's only connected to our sidechain version.

82
00:05:13,960 --> 00:05:20,520
So we have an exact carbon copy of, we have Zcash and we have Ethereum, and because
that's

83
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:24,760
because those are things that people might actually want to use.

84
00:05:24,760 --> 00:05:28,800
So this is true that it's unfortunate in the sidechain, if you're in the sidechain
business,

85
00:05:29,640 --> 00:05:32,040
you have to like, people think you're like an alt coiner or something, which is the
opposite

86
00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:33,040
of the truth.

87
00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:39,040
But so 99% of the projects are terrible, but there's like 1% are, maybe half a
percent

88
00:05:39,040 --> 00:05:42,400
are fringe and half a percent are maybe good.

89
00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:49,880
You know, like whatever happened to Namecoin, huge lost missed opportunity,
prediction markets,

90
00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:50,880
I think is big.

91
00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:55,480
I think, you know, so we have lots of ideas that could be really big and we have
some

92
00:05:55,480 --> 00:06:02,720
that are fringe and the idea that we could have a Zcash level privacy, you know, it
just,

93
00:06:02,720 --> 00:06:06,320
I don't know, like if you're familiar with how Bitcoin is used today, there's lots
of

94
00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:07,320
privacy issues.

95
00:06:07,320 --> 00:06:10,680
It's a lot of hard work to maintain privacy.

96
00:06:10,680 --> 00:06:16,000
There's lots of phishing when, when Bitcoin is used in commerce, people don't like,
they

97
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:20,280
have to give a new address every time, whereas in Zcash, the addresses are reusable.

98
00:06:21,080 --> 00:06:26,720
So the idea that it has no merit and that no one would find such a thing to be
interesting,

99
00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:33,000
I just think cannot possibly be the case, but you know, who knows, but that's the
thing

100
00:06:33,000 --> 00:06:36,880
is we're going to build this option for people and if people don't like it, then
they can

101
00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:40,680
walk away unharmed.

102
00:06:40,680 --> 00:06:47,520
And if, as I suspect, I mean, just look at the huge growth of the, all these, like
all

103
00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:49,640
these Ethereum products.

104
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:52,240
I think a lot of them are not, are not genuine.

105
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:55,280
Of course, I think a lot of them are just people trying to pump Ethereum and they
have

106
00:06:55,280 --> 00:06:59,760
a project and they, they fund each other and then they degenerate what looks like
activity.

107
00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:04,560
But again, that's, that's a big bet to bet you're betting on a hundred percent of
the

108
00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:08,400
alternatives being having no value.

109
00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,600
And I think that is an unwise risk.

110
00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:11,600
Okay.

111
00:07:11,600 --> 00:07:16,880
So let me just get a question on how Drivechain helps mining through and then
explain

112
00:07:16,880 --> 00:07:18,620
merge mining as well.

113
00:07:19,620 --> 00:07:20,620
Yes.

114
00:07:20,620 --> 00:07:23,500
So merge mining is a very old idea that was invented by Satoshi.

115
00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:28,180
It was sort of like co-invented by him, but he, it's this idea that you do the same
number

116
00:07:28,180 --> 00:07:34,140
of hashes, do the exact same amount of effort, but you can collect the block reward,
the

117
00:07:34,140 --> 00:07:39,980
fees and the new coins potentially from many different chains.

118
00:07:39,980 --> 00:07:44,900
And the counterintuitive thing about this is the, you can't really stop it from
happening

119
00:07:44,900 --> 00:07:45,900
actually.

120
00:07:46,180 --> 00:07:51,100
So like Namecoin was designed in 2010 to do this.

121
00:07:51,100 --> 00:07:55,420
And there's nothing that the Bitcoin network actually can't really censor it out.

122
00:07:55,420 --> 00:08:03,220
But traditional merge mining had a disadvantage that the miners had to run the
Namecoin, the

123
00:08:03,220 --> 00:08:05,220
second piece of software as well.

124
00:08:05,220 --> 00:08:10,220
So you had to run basically the altcoin node and the altcoin node could be a buggy,
it

125
00:08:10,220 --> 00:08:13,620
could be a buggy piece of software and it could crash.

126
00:08:13,620 --> 00:08:15,080
Maybe it wouldn't be as good.

127
00:08:15,260 --> 00:08:22,920
And also you got paid in Namecoin and Blind Merged Mining is this BIP301.

128
00:08:22,920 --> 00:08:26,640
You should read the BIP if you want to know exactly how it works, but what it does
is

129
00:08:26,640 --> 00:08:31,340
it changes that around so that miners don't even have to do anything.

130
00:08:31,340 --> 00:08:35,800
They just collect all the transactions that pay the highest fee.

131
00:08:35,800 --> 00:08:39,120
And one of those is one that nets the fees over.

132
00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:45,720
So they get paid with layer one BTC coins and they do not have to run, this is the
blind

133
00:08:45,720 --> 00:08:49,840
part, they do not have to run any new node software.

134
00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:55,280
So miners basically have to do absolutely no extra work at all and they just get
paid

135
00:08:55,280 --> 00:09:00,960
all the transaction, the sum of all the transaction fees of all these other chains,
which could

136
00:09:00,960 --> 00:09:05,560
potentially be, I mean, this is not going to happen tomorrow, but there's no limit
to

137
00:09:05,560 --> 00:09:07,040
how high that can go.

138
00:09:07,040 --> 00:09:11,960
That could be, that could increase mining revenues, you know, wow, like a thousand
times

139
00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:13,440
or 10, even 10,000.

140
00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:20,200
When you factor in the increased usage from fees and also like increased price
because

141
00:09:20,200 --> 00:09:24,240
the coin can now do anything, that could go directly to Ethereum.

142
00:09:24,240 --> 00:09:33,480
Ethereum fees are, I think today, literally about 10X or near enough to 10X Bitcoin
fees.

143
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:41,160
So let's just say even a fraction of Ethereum fees, like let's say we were in a post
drive

144
00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:50,520
chains world and there was a chain or a number of chains that were usurping part of
the usage

145
00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:56,880
of the Ethereum, even a small part, let's say a 10th, it would double the fee
revenue

146
00:09:56,880 --> 00:10:04,160
for miners today with a 10th of the Ethereum usage on a Bitcoin or a number of
Bitcoin

147
00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:05,760
sidechains.

148
00:10:05,760 --> 00:10:09,040
And they're doing no additional work at all.

149
00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:13,160
The history of sidechains is definitely something that I've seen in the Drivechain
chat, spoken

150
00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:18,560
about a lot, Blockstream's name gets tossed around a little bit, but the history of
sidechains

151
00:10:18,560 --> 00:10:22,600
is something I think we should talk about a little bit before we dive more into the

152
00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:26,520
benefits of Drivechain and how it works on the mining side.

153
00:10:26,520 --> 00:10:27,920
So Austin, I'll throw it over to you.

154
00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:31,840
What's the history of sidechains and Bitcoin and how they've been interpreted and
how we've

155
00:10:31,840 --> 00:10:35,600
ended up with Drivechain in the seed round?

156
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:43,920
So when you first, first, I think I had heard of it was in 2014, early 2014.

157
00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:50,480
And it was, I think, just prior to the big announcement of the blockchain having had

158
00:10:50,480 --> 00:10:56,680
raised that largest funding round in the industry at the time.

159
00:10:56,680 --> 00:10:59,960
And at the time, it was quite something.

160
00:10:59,960 --> 00:11:02,520
It was really impressive.

161
00:11:02,520 --> 00:11:09,480
It was almost jaw dropping to hear that they had raised $21 million was unheard of.

162
00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:13,360
And then Gavin Andreessen made that tweet, he was like, if this amazing company
offers

163
00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:15,320
you a job, take it or whatever.

164
00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:16,320
So the hype was huge.

165
00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:18,160
It was huge hype.

166
00:11:18,160 --> 00:11:19,160
It was huge hype.

167
00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:24,080
And part of the hype surrounding it was that I think there was the beginning of kind
of

168
00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:34,640
a nervousness or a stress around all coins in that, you know, obviously, if an all
coin

169
00:11:34,640 --> 00:11:45,280
comes and supplants Bitcoin, then all of the work and all of the investments are for
naught.

170
00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:52,280
And so I think, you know, now we've seen that tension grow into what we have today,
where,

171
00:11:52,280 --> 00:11:59,000
you know, it's quite obvious these factions and, you know, there's down the line
there,

172
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:07,040
they turn into nearly cults just mention any all coin, you know, the trading symbol
and

173
00:12:07,040 --> 00:12:12,780
Twitter and you'll see the cult come right into your mentions really quickly.

174
00:12:12,780 --> 00:12:14,760
But that wasn't that didn't exist back then.

175
00:12:15,240 --> 00:12:20,320
And it was still a very much us versus them, us as in, you know, everyone was
Bitcoiners.

176
00:12:20,320 --> 00:12:26,800
Even if you were using Peercoin or Feathercoin or, you know, speculating on even the
most

177
00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:35,720
obscure coins, in fact, even Ripple back then, I think that first and foremost, they
were

178
00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:39,320
Bitcoiners and it was all thought of as kind of one thing.

179
00:12:39,320 --> 00:12:41,360
It was us versus the banks.

180
00:12:41,360 --> 00:12:45,880
It was be your own bank or was us versus the central banks or, you know, us versus
the

181
00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:57,080
world. And, you know, I really don't know how exactly that fizzled out where
Blockstream

182
00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:05,680
pivoted. And they've definitely done a lot of it's done a lot for Bitcoin and they
have

183
00:13:05,680 --> 00:13:07,720
some great products.

184
00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:14,720
And I think the company's been very successful and has become quite valuable.

185
00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:24,900
But. Abandoning sidechains, I think was very detrimental for Bitcoin because it's
like

186
00:13:24,900 --> 00:13:35,440
Paul said. sidechains on Bitcoin are a coalition building mechanism and it kind of

187
00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:38,960
it's something that unifies all the tribes.

188
00:13:38,960 --> 00:13:42,880
And so it can it can really be powerful.

189
00:13:43,280 --> 00:13:52,920
And, you know, not only does it does it unify it also something I think that's
really

190
00:13:53,080 --> 00:13:59,800
important aspect is if you had a post sidechain world, liquidity would be
aggregated.

191
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:10,160
The fee markets would be aggregated and you wouldn't see this kind of a disbursement
of

192
00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:13,360
liquidity across all these these random coins.

193
00:14:13,520 --> 00:14:16,840
I think it would be the Bitcoin markets themselves would be a lot more liquid.

194
00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:22,840
And when you've asked me about the history of sidechains, so that was the the
beginning

195
00:14:22,880 --> 00:14:29,360
of it. And, you know, I think that obviously the block size war was a was a big
turning

196
00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:33,280
point in the politics and the culture of Bitcoin.

197
00:14:35,400 --> 00:14:41,160
It would have been a really important thing for sidechains to have had existed
prior to

198
00:14:41,160 --> 00:14:47,400
the block size war for because of that coalition building aspect of sidechains.

199
00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:51,240
And we could have maybe avoided all of that drama.

200
00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:55,440
And in fact, all the big blockers, they could have created their own sidechain or

201
00:14:55,440 --> 00:14:59,880
multiple sidechains and continue to hold Bitcoin.

202
00:15:00,240 --> 00:15:03,280
And all of that value would have accrued to Bitcoin.

203
00:15:03,280 --> 00:15:07,720
All of the value and all of the tension and stress that was went off and all these
all

204
00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:10,480
coins would have stayed in with Bitcoin.

205
00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:18,320
And maybe Paul can interject with maybe those middle years of the sidechain
history.

206
00:15:18,520 --> 00:15:23,360
Well, yeah, I mean, I'd be happy to tell everyone exactly what I experienced
firsthand,

207
00:15:23,360 --> 00:15:25,200
which is that I got into Bitcoin.

208
00:15:25,240 --> 00:15:26,640
I was like Bitcoin is super cool.

209
00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:29,320
I happen to be into prediction markets separately.

210
00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:34,320
And prediction markets are also they're actually subject to failure in sort of a
similar

211
00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:35,720
way. So I designed this thing.

212
00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:38,760
I didn't I wanted it to be prediction markets on the block chain.

213
00:15:38,760 --> 00:15:41,920
So you might today it might be called smart contract or whatever.

214
00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:44,840
And I wanted to have this peer to peer Oracle thing.

215
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,480
So I started designing this and I was like, there's no way you can bolt this onto

216
00:15:48,480 --> 00:15:50,280
Bitcoin. It's just like an opcode or something.

217
00:15:50,280 --> 00:15:52,640
You need all this custom stuff to be happening.

218
00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:53,760
And it's very convoluted.

219
00:15:54,640 --> 00:15:55,960
So I designed my own block.

220
00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:57,640
I designed what was basically an altcoin.

221
00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:00,840
And I called that project Truthcoin.

222
00:16:01,480 --> 00:16:05,080
But I was a big Bitcoiner at heart, so I never even like I never considered
launching an

223
00:16:05,080 --> 00:16:07,560
altcoin. I was just doing it for the tech, of course.

224
00:16:07,840 --> 00:16:11,120
And and then Blockstream came out with this idea, the sidechain.

225
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:12,200
And I was like, oh, perfect.

226
00:16:12,680 --> 00:16:14,200
And I wrote to them about it.

227
00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:18,760
They wrote back. We were talking about a partnership on the idea.

228
00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:22,680
We were talking about all this, like how the right way to do sidechains, what to
do,

229
00:16:22,680 --> 00:16:27,000
et cetera. They came out with this paper in October 2014.

230
00:16:27,880 --> 00:16:31,920
The paper had an idea called the skip list in Appendix B.

231
00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:36,200
That as far as I am aware, it was never built by anyone.

232
00:16:36,680 --> 00:16:42,240
And they had in Appendix A, they said, if you just send it to a multisig wallet

233
00:16:42,520 --> 00:16:47,880
controlled by us and we can we can like simulate the sidechain and then we'll give

234
00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:50,720
you your money back. We promise.

235
00:16:50,880 --> 00:16:53,440
And we'll have lots of other people be in the multisig.

236
00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:57,960
So this is a very, very naive idea that did not involve any technology and did not

237
00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:01,600
involve anything new. It was not a way to simulate the altcoin.

238
00:17:01,600 --> 00:17:05,760
But they were like they were being realistic from an engineering point of view.

239
00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:08,840
And they were saying this, we know that's a lot of work to build that other thing.

240
00:17:09,480 --> 00:17:13,560
It's like kind of like how they have the astronauts practice in like a centrifuge or

241
00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:16,320
something before they build the actual rocket.

242
00:17:16,360 --> 00:17:20,720
So they had this thing and it was explicitly mentioned several times.

243
00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:24,080
And I have the video and all the bookmarks there.

244
00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:28,960
It's explicitly many people made it very clear that this was kind of like a test
type

245
00:17:28,960 --> 00:17:32,520
of a thing. That was 2014.

246
00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:40,520
I got I got I was I was looking at maybe working with Blockstream more formally to

247
00:17:40,520 --> 00:17:42,040
work on this prediction markets thing.

248
00:17:42,360 --> 00:17:45,880
Instead, I met I met Blockstream in November 2014.

249
00:17:45,880 --> 00:17:50,880
I met Roger in December the next month, and he just paid me immediately to quit my
job

250
00:17:50,880 --> 00:17:52,640
and start working on it. And which I did.

251
00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:56,240
And that became what was on BitcoinHiveMine.com now the software that is.

252
00:17:57,320 --> 00:18:02,040
Sort of, you know, software is never completed per se, but so I was working on all

253
00:18:02,040 --> 00:18:07,160
that. And then the block size war started to happen.

254
00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:12,480
Scaling Bitcoin one was that was in September 2015.

255
00:18:12,800 --> 00:18:17,000
And then I was like reading more carefully because I was finishing the project, the

256
00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:19,400
sidechain project. So I was finishing the software.

257
00:18:20,680 --> 00:18:23,560
For the prediction market, this prediction market, this fringe kind of prediction

258
00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:28,160
markets idea, there's a weird idea and I don't expect I never expected anyone to
like

259
00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:30,920
get a huge buy. I was like, this is just my weird pet idea.

260
00:18:31,560 --> 00:18:33,600
But I was like, how do I turn it on as a sidechain?

261
00:18:34,280 --> 00:18:40,200
And I thought that the Appendix B thing was actually a little bit overcomplicated.

262
00:18:40,200 --> 00:18:44,160
And it also had some detrimental features that you could erase if you made the

263
00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:46,840
sidechain asymmetric and this other stuff.

264
00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:49,440
So then I wrote this Drivechain thing in 2015.

265
00:18:49,760 --> 00:18:55,120
And then I kind of I did sort of presented at scaling to in like they're like have

266
00:18:55,120 --> 00:18:56,840
these these informal things.

267
00:18:57,000 --> 00:18:59,800
I don't get too into the weeds on that, but I kind of presented this idea.

268
00:19:00,440 --> 00:19:05,880
And there was this kind of folk idea that within Blockstream, like there was just it

269
00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:11,280
was this thing that people believed and spoke about, which was that you could not
use

270
00:19:11,280 --> 00:19:12,640
sidechains for scaling.

271
00:19:13,040 --> 00:19:15,680
And this idea had just entered the culture somehow.

272
00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:18,800
And I was checking and double checking it because I was like, huh.

273
00:19:18,800 --> 00:19:25,200
And the thing that I designed, you know, the layer one nodes don't have to look at

274
00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:27,840
anything the sidechain is doing at all, because otherwise how would it work?

275
00:19:28,160 --> 00:19:30,320
And so I was like checking and rechecking this.

276
00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:34,840
And I was like, you know, there actually is no there is no reason why they cannot be

277
00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:37,760
used for scaling at all.

278
00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:41,640
And so I made this long, these huge presentations in 2016.

279
00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:46,840
In June and September, about all of that, and then I presented at scaling three in

280
00:19:46,840 --> 00:19:47,840
October 2016.

281
00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:53,360
And then in January 2017, this is where things started to go awry because I was
doing

282
00:19:53,360 --> 00:19:54,960
all these theoretical presentations.

283
00:19:54,960 --> 00:20:00,760
And then I went to Construct, which is the San Francisco conference, and their
Blockstream

284
00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:03,480
presented on this strong federations thing.

285
00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:08,800
And that meant that they had spent all the intervening years doubling down on the

286
00:20:10,040 --> 00:20:14,960
practice, temporary idea, and that for some reason they had given up on actually

287
00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:17,160
building the new technology idea.

288
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,240
So then I was very dismayed and I thought, I don't know what's going on.

289
00:20:21,240 --> 00:20:28,240
Like maybe they found some kind of problem or maybe they are giving up or maybe they

290
00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:29,360
just want to do the easier thing.

291
00:20:29,360 --> 00:20:33,600
And I don't know. I still to this day have no, you know, I don't know exactly what's

292
00:20:33,600 --> 00:20:37,360
going on with that. To be completely, 100 percent honest with you, I don't know why.

293
00:20:37,520 --> 00:20:42,360
But I did look into it and I think they have just a mistaken view on merge mining.

294
00:20:42,360 --> 00:20:45,440
They have there's something where they believe something that's the opposite of the

295
00:20:45,440 --> 00:20:49,200
truth. And I wrote about that last October.

296
00:20:49,760 --> 00:20:55,400
And just to interject and clarify here, what we're discussing is the Liquid
Federated

297
00:20:55,400 --> 00:21:00,920
Network, which operates more or less as like a very convoluted multi-sig in order to

298
00:21:00,920 --> 00:21:04,960
you peg in your Bitcoin, you hand it over to Blockstream's federation, and then you

299
00:21:04,960 --> 00:21:09,160
have Liquid Bitcoin, which can interact on the Liquid Blockchain Network, interact
with

300
00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:14,640
its dApps. But it doesn't have the trust assumptions or the parameters that a lot of

301
00:21:14,640 --> 00:21:16,840
people wanted for Sidechain to actually have.

302
00:21:16,840 --> 00:21:20,560
And I think you've even said at some point that's not really a sidechain, just a

303
00:21:20,560 --> 00:21:21,160
multi-sig.

304
00:21:21,800 --> 00:21:26,640
Well, it lacks the I would think the distinguishing feature would be like you have

305
00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:28,560
something like Monero or whatever.

306
00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:35,040
And so the question is, how do you how do you, quote, use Liquid to have like a bit

307
00:21:35,040 --> 00:21:41,480
Monero, like a simulated Monero, like you're using these ring signatures and bullet

308
00:21:41,480 --> 00:21:45,120
proofs of Monero, but you're spending Bitcoin.

309
00:21:45,360 --> 00:21:49,680
And the answer is with Liquid, you have to like find a new you have to find your own

310
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:54,800
federation. But you see, that's the entire content of the idea is the federation.

311
00:21:55,480 --> 00:21:57,080
So you have to do all the work yourself.

312
00:21:57,080 --> 00:21:58,360
It's not really doing anything.

313
00:21:58,400 --> 00:22:02,720
The idea is not doing anything for you, whereas instead it should be like a process

314
00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:12,320
where. You just say, I want I click this button and I now here it is, so I don't.

315
00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:19,600
And. It's it's kind of a little bit of a circular reasoning, it says that the but,

316
00:22:19,600 --> 00:22:22,720
you know, they have they have a strategy behind that, what they try to do is they
try

317
00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:26,280
to say, listen, on Liquid, what we're going to do is we're going to make everything
so

318
00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:31,080
private and we're going to geographically distribute the signers and it will be

319
00:22:31,080 --> 00:22:34,080
private. And this will these people, they'll just be like blind.

320
00:22:35,000 --> 00:22:39,480
Signers of just this, they'll just be blindly executing the software, but that
doesn't

321
00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:44,760
change the fact that whoever has the multi-sig keys can just leave with the money.

322
00:22:45,320 --> 00:22:47,040
And that is the that is what it is.

323
00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:50,640
So around that time, I'm condensing history around around a little bit.

324
00:22:51,280 --> 00:22:55,480
We had blockchain building Liquid, which was probably like the most notable sidechain

325
00:22:55,480 --> 00:22:57,000
design for Bitcoin.

326
00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:01,600
There's a few other things out there like rootstock stacks, et cetera.

327
00:23:02,240 --> 00:23:06,880
But the main focus shifted to Lightning around that time and has continued to build
up

328
00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:11,680
where Lightning is the de facto layer two of choice for most Bitcoiners.

329
00:23:12,080 --> 00:23:17,280
And Drivechain implicitly would be a competitor to Lightning or an alternative

330
00:23:17,280 --> 00:23:19,560
Lightning or make Lightning obsolete.

331
00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:21,760
Curious to get your take on it.

332
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:27,880
Not asking necessarily for any hot takes on Lightning, but just some context for how

333
00:23:28,120 --> 00:23:31,040
Drivechains and Lightning fit together in the Bitcoin stack.

334
00:23:31,600 --> 00:23:35,000
There are ways in which it would compete and there are ways in which it would
cooperate.

335
00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:44,440
I think the Lightning network has a distinctive advantage in the fact that the
payment is

336
00:23:44,440 --> 00:23:51,040
instant. Whereas this has a relative disadvantage because with merged mining, the
best

337
00:23:51,040 --> 00:23:56,200
you can do is one block every 10 minutes, you can do weird other things where you
can

338
00:23:56,440 --> 00:24:03,480
change the you can try to speed up the block time using these weird hacks, which is

339
00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:05,960
possible, but not really as meaningful.

340
00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:09,880
So in a sense, the confirmations are slower on the sidechain.

341
00:24:11,200 --> 00:24:15,320
So that's one way in which Lightning is superior as a competitor.

342
00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:21,560
One way in which they might collaborate is that Lightning cannot onboard without the
use

343
00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:25,000
of bytes on whichever blockchain you onboard to.

344
00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:31,080
So the layer one block size is not large enough to onboard the entire planet's
Lightning, to

345
00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:35,320
say the least. But you could have people on board, the coins could go to the
sidechain

346
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:37,600
first and then onboard to Lightning there.

347
00:24:37,920 --> 00:24:42,120
And so then it would be onboarded to Lightning in a different way.

348
00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:50,240
There's all kinds of ways in which there are advantages and disadvantages.

349
00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:55,240
And the key thing is really that the end user should really be the one who decides
what

350
00:24:55,240 --> 00:24:57,120
they use and why.

351
00:24:57,120 --> 00:24:59,978
I think it's a big mistake to.

352
00:24:59,978 --> 00:25:03,978
Obviously, as an engineer or scientist, you'd want to make an intelligent guess at
what the user would probably want.

353
00:25:03,978 --> 00:25:10,978
But this is a case where they would be pretty different. And you would think there'd
be a lot of... there would be a big appeal.

354
00:25:10,978 --> 00:25:18,978
So the one thing that I think a lot of people get wrong, which is very
disappointing, because it's so important,

355
00:25:18,978 --> 00:25:23,978
which is that different people are very different and different transactions are
very different.

356
00:25:23,978 --> 00:25:29,978
So like you're going to have Ross Albright, when he goes and buys his coffee, he
might use something completely different.

357
00:25:29,978 --> 00:25:41,978
He might use a large block sidechain or something, but that doesn't have super
strong privacy or super strong decentralization because he's buying coffee.

358
00:25:41,978 --> 00:25:46,978
And he's walking into Starbucks and his face is on the security camera or whatever.

359
00:25:46,978 --> 00:25:52,978
And then when he goes home and he does Silk Road or whatever, you may want to use
something completely different.

360
00:25:52,978 --> 00:25:59,978
So people are different. Transactions are different. And that is why.

361
00:25:59,978 --> 00:26:03,978
But, yeah, there are big differences between the onboarding is the biggest
difference.

362
00:26:03,978 --> 00:26:08,978
The biggest advantage sidechains have over Lightning and the speed is the biggest
disadvantage.

363
00:26:08,978 --> 00:26:13,978
Awesome. I'm curious to get your take on this. And Paul, again, if you want to jump
in,

364
00:26:13,978 --> 00:26:16,978
Awesome. I'm curious to get your take on this. And Paul, again, if you want to pick
it up.

365
00:26:16,978 --> 00:26:23,978
What is the cultural difference here? I think with sidechains, they kind of got
batted down.

366
00:26:23,978 --> 00:26:27,978
We saw Vitalik boot up Ethereum. It's taken a lot of those transactions.

367
00:26:27,978 --> 00:26:31,978
People have wanted sidechains, but the Bitcoin culture has not wanted them.

368
00:26:31,978 --> 00:26:39,978
They've chosen more or less Lightning. So Drivechain seems to be a rebellion against
pushing back against the grain a little bit.

369
00:26:39,978 --> 00:26:45,978
We've even seen that in some Twitter interaction so far since you guys made the
announcement on Tuesday.

370
00:26:45,978 --> 00:26:50,978
Do you guys see it in that lens? Do you see it as something that's like kind of
pushing against the grain?

371
00:26:50,978 --> 00:27:01,978
And do you think that there is a chance of something like this getting implemented
in Bitcoin with such a strong push and dominance on Bitcoin ossifying as it is right
now?

372
00:27:01,978 --> 00:27:21,978
The culture of Bitcoin, first of all, obviously, it's not monolithic, as many of us
know, and no one person or even one faction or kind of, you know, I don't know how
they describe these days.

373
00:27:21,978 --> 00:27:30,978
Obviously, in the past, we had the big blockers and the small blockers. But in the
current moment, it wasn't so clearly defined.

374
00:27:30,978 --> 00:27:36,978
Once you move forward from that, you look back and think, oh, that one, he was a big
blocker and he was a small blocker.

375
00:27:36,978 --> 00:27:49,978
But, you know, as that was all kind of developing, it was a little bit more
ambiguous. And so the factions that are around today, I don't think, you know, I
think they're a little they're fluid.

376
00:27:49,978 --> 00:28:07,978
And I definitely completely disagree with any assessment that that Bitcoin culture
is is against is against Drivechains. And I think that the Drivechains day is coming
up.

377
00:28:07,978 --> 00:28:35,978
And it's just the more you understand it, and when you really understand the
implications and the power of it, and, you know, the potential that it has to, to
strengthen Bitcoin and to improve the industry, to improve the relative position of
all stakeholders, businesses, miners, developers, users.

378
00:28:36,978 --> 00:28:39,978
I think you'll you'll see more and more people get on board.

379
00:28:39,978 --> 00:28:49,978
Yeah. Paul, any follow up thoughts on that based on my earlier question or awesome
thoughts about like how difficult it may be? I mean, I think, you know, like, I
would give up on the idea.

380
00:28:49,978 --> 00:29:10,978
Like, I searched, like, intensely to find, like, why shouldn't I do the idea? Like,
that was what I was mostly doing the whole time. I was like, but but it's really
just the case that that that the people who don't like the idea is really just as
the case that they they don't know anything about the idea, which I don't even
really blame them because so much happens in Bitcoin, right?

381
00:29:11,978 --> 00:29:25,978
Like in a given week that you there's no possible way you can look into every single
thing, but people really do not the any of the critics really don't know. And even
the people with an extreme amount of expertise.

382
00:29:25,978 --> 00:29:45,978
They are just mistaken about there is this the idea they're kind of fear grew in the
mind of the developers that miners would get too professional and they a lot of
people clung desperately to this idea that each person would have one CPU and they
would all be equal strength.

383
00:29:45,978 --> 00:30:09,978
And it'd be a kind of democracy or something. And and this this, you know, and that
that idea was very old and people have clung to it desperately, despite the fact
that the reality that the theory was always never that was never going to work
because the difficulty adjustment fires the bottom half performers every two weeks.

384
00:30:09,978 --> 00:30:21,978
So it was always going to be rapidly evolving mining situation, but also in
practice, we see the ongoing specialization of miners, miners. Now they have to find
cheap power.

385
00:30:21,978 --> 00:30:33,978
They have to find they have to find like tax credits. Now they have to find the best
basics. They have to manage their balance sheet. They have to do all this stuff that
the enormous number of a very specialized things.

386
00:30:33,978 --> 00:30:51,978
And that is what people were always afraid would happen. And they always thought
that maybe merge mining would contribute to that. But now we see that that I was
right when back in 2015, when I said, merge money has almost nothing to do with
that. That's happening anyway. And the merge mining part is a tiny, tiny, tiny.

387
00:30:51,978 --> 00:31:12,978
Microscopic drop in the bucket compared to just the ongoing quests to have to do
more hashes at a cheaper price. And so that that the idea also this this idea was
linked to an idea that mining is like part of Bitcoin, whereas really my miners are
actually users of Bitcoin.

388
00:31:13,978 --> 00:31:34,978
So the miners need to run the Bitcoin protocol. But if you run the Bitcoin protocol,
if you run a Bitcoin node, you don't need to mine. So it's just unfortunate this
somehow in the culture, this idea arrived backwards. And it's I don't know, for some
reason that that was all it took to make this this idea languish.

389
00:31:34,978 --> 00:32:02,978
I think, I think there's another more practical part of it is that people join, they
get excited about sidechains, then they become impatient, and then they just leave
and they start start their altcoin project or something. So they leave and they
start, they work on Namecoin, the altcoin, or they work on Monero, the altcoin. And
now they hate sidechains. Now the last thing they want is so they flip 100%. And
then people join or they you know, they join, they go to Bitcoin cash or whatever.

390
00:32:02,978 --> 00:32:26,978
So now they now they flip. And similarly, who stays in Bitcoin and who, who rises up
in status? You know, what's what's a better sell the idea that we're the we're God's
chosen people, and all you have to do is nothing and you're going to be welcomed
into the citadel and everyone else will be your personal slaves and blah, blah,
blah, and you'll get all the women and etc, etc.

391
00:32:26,978 --> 00:32:52,978
I'll just for doing nothing just because you bought you bought in versus someone
that says the user, we need to make sure that we win the users transaction, we need
to make sure that we actually this is a useful thing that takes a lot of work. And
so that's just naturally a harder sell. It's very easy for people to just say, Oh,
everything's, everything's going perfectly.

392
00:32:52,978 --> 00:33:19,978
Yeah, there's definitely some antagonism against any changes to Bitcoin. I've done a
few interviews this year with a few different people. You mentioned Jeremy Rubin, we
did one with him beginning of the year, he definitely received some pressure for his
covenants idea. The Starkware team is working on some validium proof ideas or zk
role based ideas for scaling Bitcoin, more or less ignored from what I see so far, I
think it has some promise or potential.

393
00:33:19,978 --> 00:33:37,978
But at the very least, like talking about it, but it seems to me and not to
generalize, but crypto, Twitter, and Bitcoin, Twitter, seem to dismiss a lot of
these scaling ideas, even though there seems to be a large benefit, and there's a
decent argument for it. Just like you were mentioning there.

394
00:33:37,978 --> 00:34:07,778
Yes, it's well, that's just because the Twitter is biased towards people who can get
likes and retweets. So that's not biased towards the truth. And that's, that's much
easier to get a like, you only have whatever 280 characters. So you know, if you
want to just say something simple, like whatever, like a few understand this, and
then you just get the likes. I was with Adam back on at Bitcoin Amsterdam. And we
were talking about this issue. I mean, we're, we're talking about

395
00:34:07,978 --> 00:34:26,978
how to make sidechains happen faster. But we're talking about like the how long does
it take for something to get through. And from what I remember, he was like, he
didn't flinch at all at the idea that a new soft fork would take another five years
or so, like he was talking about simplicity or whatever. So. So that's like a very
slow speed.

396
00:34:27,978 --> 00:34:55,978
I think it would be better if we just had, we had a sidechain idea, we had the 300,
then more or less instantly, you could spin up the new sidechain. And you wouldn't
need to move slowly. In fact, you could ossify Bitcoin completely, the layer one
part forever, which would be great. And then you could also have the flexibility and
the upper layers, which I think is what, what that's just going to be.

397
00:34:55,978 --> 00:35:24,978
I think this just has to be the future, because there's no way to get everyone to
agree. Like I was saying at the very beginning, you have people who want different
things. A lot of people will say like the current, the current thing to say in
Bitcoin, you know, the conventional wisdom is just to say, well, people are, they,
they're going to learn to love it the way it is, and whatever, they're not going to
have a choice. And they're, they're going to, whatever it is, is, that's what
they're going to learn to love.

398
00:35:25,978 --> 00:35:52,978
I'm not sure if that is, you know, they might be right. If so, then that's great for
all of us as Bitcoiners, because it means Bitcoin is going to succeed, whether or
not this company does anything. And so that's great. Good for us. But if, if, if
there's any chance that something else could become more popular, that's an
existential risk to Bitcoin. And so we should at least keep an eye on it.

399
00:35:53,978 --> 00:36:17,978
I think the user is going to decide what they are going to use. And a lot of people
are going to use like whatever Venmo or something. So we've got to get, we have to
compete for the user. That's what I think is a neglected topic. We, everyone's just
saying, well, well, they'll be forced to come in. Well, maybe, I mean, okay, if
that's the case, then everything will be fine for Bitcoin.

400
00:36:17,978 --> 00:36:33,978
So then if you believe that, then you don't need to worry about anything, right?
Because so then why you, why you listening to a podcast? Why you, why you have to
just, you know, go for a walk and just wait for everything to work out perfectly
without anything changing. But I don't know if that's in the cards.

401
00:36:33,978 --> 00:37:02,978
Yeah, it's a fairly deterministic way of looking at Bitcoin. Just to wrap up here,
let's talk about the BIP process, what you guys are expecting for that. In a minute
or two, Austin, just want to throw it up to you. What is your guys' thoughts right
now on using LayerTwo Labs to push forward with the BIPs? And are you guys worried
about that whole process? I mean, the BIPs have been out there for quite a while.
There's testnets. There's ways to practice with them. The software is out there and
has been for quite a while. But what is your thought with LayerTwo Labs?

402
00:37:03,978 --> 00:37:32,978
Well, I'm just going to interrupt and say, I think it's education or whatever. I
mean, Austin, you can, you can say, but I think we're going to try to do that
education, communication, idea, coalition building, and, you know, demonstrations.
We're going to release more software that does this stuff. But so yeah, but I am
worried about it. Yeah, I think it's, I don't know, like, even what, but I just,
again, the idea, the only reason that people don't like the idea is because they
don't understand it really.

403
00:37:32,978 --> 00:37:58,978
And the idea is very, I designed it from the ground up to have no risk to the Layer
1 base chain. But this, to this day, there's still confusion about that. So, and I,
in the original 2015 post, I wrote about why it, why it could not negatively affect.
And then I presented in 2016. So, but still that's confusing thing. So I think
that's what we're going to try to do. I think, Austin, if you...

404
00:37:59,978 --> 00:38:14,978
Yeah, a big goal of the formation and formalization of the company and this effort
is to kind of push forward this education initiative in a much stronger and more
effective way.

405
00:38:14,978 --> 00:38:36,978
You know, it is, it is complicated, but from a technical aspect, I think it is a lot
less complicated than many other, many other bits or kind of blockchain technology.

406
00:38:36,978 --> 00:38:58,978
You know, things like roll-ups and stuff like that are far more complex than once
you actually dive in and understand the mechanism and the security of Drivechains. I
think it's, I think a lot of people will be able to grok it, I think a little more
quickly than some of some other, some other concepts.

407
00:38:58,978 --> 00:39:18,978
But, but, you know, from being on the periphery of it for years and even going
through the process myself of, of through various stages of understanding, because
when I first heard of it, I, you know, I didn't immediately understand. I definitely
wasn't immediately a proponent.

408
00:39:18,978 --> 00:39:46,978
I was quite skeptical, like I am of, of everything in this entire industry.
Drivechains has been one of the few things that, that I think on every time I look
back on it, it, I kind of, it becomes more legitimate in my mind, in my eye, as
opposed to like everything else where you look back and be like, oh, you know,
things that, you know, you had open been open minded towards and close up.

409
00:39:46,978 --> 00:40:04,978
Yeah, I think it's very important that we just kind of present the, how it works and
the benefits of it in a way that is digestible and, and explains all these things
very simply.

410
00:40:04,978 --> 00:40:26,978
That's probably one of the main focuses of the company and kind of our first stages
as far as like worrying about the bit process. I mean, I'm sure it's not going to be
easy, but I think the best thing we can do is just try to build out that coalition
and we'll see what happens.

411
00:40:26,978 --> 00:40:50,978
Um, you know, even if I'm still very, very bullish on Bitcoin longterm, um, with or
without Drivechains, I just, you know, I think that I've come to believe that if
Drivechains were in Bitcoin today, it would be a very different industry and a very
different picture on a lot of fronts.

412
00:40:50,978 --> 00:41:14,978
And I think Bitcoin would be far more valuable to be perfectly frank. Um, I think it
would be far more liquid and I think it would be far more valuable. And it's one of
the main reasons I'm such a big proponent. And, you know, there's a lot of people
out there. I'm sure that would like to see Bitcoin become much more valuable, uh,
more secure and, and more liquid.

413
00:41:15,978 --> 00:41:35,978
And I think Drivechain is just sitting there on the table, ready to be deployed. And
it's one of the most powerful tools that, um, Bitcoin has there and its potential
arsenal. Uh, you know, it's one of the most powerful arrows in Bitcoin's quiver that
has yet to be fired.

414
00:41:35,978 --> 00:42:04,978
Uh, so actually apart from being worried, I'm, I'm, I would say the opposite because
I'm bullish on Bitcoin without it, but I'm ultra hyper mega bullish with it. So if
we even have a small percentage chance of getting, um, these bits merged and, and
Drivechains implemented, I think it's, it's, it's, it's very, it will, it will be a
very, uh,

415
00:42:05,978 --> 00:42:15,978
you know, I don't want to talk in investment terms, but I think it would be, it's
going to be a very beneficial thing to all stakeholders. And so, yeah, let's say
I'm, I'm actually quite excited about it all.

416
00:42:15,978 --> 00:42:31,978
Oh, hopefully this podcast can be a great first step in towards educating people
about Drivechain. Uh, let's get last thought. Where can people find your work?
Drivechain, telegram, Twitter, is there a blog post, things like that? All first to
you and then back up to Austin.

417
00:42:32,978 --> 00:42:58,978
Well, we have a, we have Drivechain that info, which is like, that's kind of like
the gray matter. That is like a site with all of like the, all my technical
presentations and all my thoughts and things like that. Uh, I'm not, I think we're
going to have to build something that's a little more digestible to the lay person
that is going to probably be a completely different, uh, thing. But drivechain.info is like, that's like what I built to try and show it to the Bitcoin technical
community.

418
00:42:59,978 --> 00:43:18,978
Uh, and so there's enormous amount of stuff there, including there's a cool YouTube
playlist where tons of videos and you can just click through. And if you don't like
one, you can just click to the next one or whatever, do whatever you like. There's
presentations, there's debates, there's me on a podcast, there's me on a panel,
there's all kinds of stuff. So.

419
00:43:19,978 --> 00:43:40,978
So we've got lots of that and we have the software is there too on drive chin, that
info. So we have software that you can download and you can see for yourself, it's
test net software. So the Bitcoin isn't real, but, uh, that's only because it hasn't
activated. So you can see what it would do if it were, if it, if it were real with
your own two eyes.

420
00:43:40,978 --> 00:44:03,978
And then that's great too, because we actually put a lot of effort into the GUI and
to try to make it help explain, um, what's happening. But yeah, that's, uh, that's
like its own thing. And we want to work more. That's one of the other things we want
to do is want to work more on making that easy to make it very easy for people to
download and try the software for themselves. That's the only way anyone will really
know what it's doing.

421
00:44:03,978 --> 00:44:32,978
And it's very well done. It's, um, far from vaporware. This software has been, uh,
actively worked on for, for years now. And so I think, um, for people that have that
level of interest, uh, I would, I would recommend to download and try it out because
it does work very well and, and, and definitely drives home. Uh, I think an
understanding of, of Drivechains and what it, what it could be when it's.

422
00:44:34,978 --> 00:44:58,978
There's also, there's, there's, there's some, uh, fan sites, um, Drivechain dot X,
Y, Z, and, and we're working on, uh, kind of a LayerTwo Labs. Um, right now we have
just a, uh, like a placeholder site with our company mission and such, but, um,
we're working on a more extensive site that will explain these things in layman's
terms. Uh, and that should be up shortly soon in the next few weeks.

423
00:44:59,978 --> 00:45:04,978
Awesome. You guys, awesome. Twitter account, medium, any place to follow people for
people to follow you?

424
00:45:05,978 --> 00:45:13,978
Yeah, I have a Twitter account is a BTC is money. Um, I'll probably try to be a
little more active there now than in the past.

425
00:45:14,978 --> 00:45:25,978
Awesome. Well, thank you both so much for joining the mining pod today. Uh, be sure
also to check out the Drivechain telegram channel. It's pretty good, pretty lively
conversations there every day. But again, thank you both so much for joining.

426
00:45:25,978 --> 00:45:26,978
Thank you much. Appreciate it.

427
00:45:26,978 --> 00:45:27,978
Thanks for having us.
